“The formulae that Whitehall uses to divide up precious resources to different people and places can be complex, arbitrary and often indefensible. In recent years, eyebrows have been raised — and corrective action taken — over the unfair distribution of A-level grades, local housing quotas, and transport investment. But there is one algorithm whose blatant unfairness and rampant anachronism remains wholly unreformed: the local government funding formula.
The problem is not so much the formula itself but the data that goes into it. It’s well known that the property values it relies on have not been updated since 1991, in spite of London house prices surging from 1.4 times to 1.9 times the England average in the past thirty years since. Less well understood is that the current formula also draws on traffic data from the last Labour government, unemployment data gathered in the depths of the post-2008 labour market, and population data from 2001, before Tony Blair’s failure to enforce accession controls on new EU countries drastically swelled migration flows to the UK…”
You can read the full article here.
'The Observer' quotes figures from Onward's 'Breaking Blue' report which breaks down the results of the 2024 election. They use the figures to make a case for what the next Tory leader need to prioritise.
'Conservative Home' mentions Onward's 'The British Entrepreneur' report. The article quotes Onward's findings that British workers are becoming “unusually risk-averse” when it comes to setting up their own business.
Onward's 'Capital Issues' report is quoted in a 'Financial Times' article on AIM markets and UK small-cap stocks.
'The Financial Times' covers Onward's 'Capital Issue' report which calls for the abolition of London's AIM markets.
A 'CityAM' article about abolishing London's AIM markets quotes Onward's 'Capital Issues' report.
'CityAM' quotes Onward's 'Capital Issues' report, which calls for the immediate abolition of London's AIM market.
