PM-Chancellor partnerships benefit from a healthy tension

i Newspaper

Will Tanner writes in the i Newspaper about reported tensions between the Prime Minister’s grand spending plans and the Chancellor’s desire to keep finances in check. He writes:

“But the Prime Minister should not want to move his Chancellor at all. The truth is that tension between Number 10 and HM Treasury is a feature, not a bug, of the system. The Treasury’s gearing towards financial probity balances out Number 10’s incentive towards tax giveaways and greater spending. The former is a far-sighted department, focused on future generations of taxpayers and long-term economic trends; the latter is naturally short-termist, focused on delivering for the voters of today and maintaining political capital. These institutional differences increase the quality and ambition of policy.”

Read the full column here.

Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on email
No Turning Back

The 2019 General Election and the UK’s new electoral geography.

The Times Red Box

Will Tanner writes for Times Red Box ahead of the Chancellor's budget