Will Tanner: Everyone knows the moral case for levelling up. But it makes economic sense too.

Conservative Home

Director Will Tanner wrote for Conservative Home about why levelling up makes economic sense, not just moral sense. He writes:

“The political argument for levelling up is straightforward. The Conservatives assembled an electoral coalition in 2019 that is both more likely to live in poorer places and more working class than even the Labour Party. Those votes, in the Prime Minister’s words, were “lent”. They need to be repaid. If the Conservatives want to retain their majority, it is politically essential that levelling up delivers.

The moral case is simple. The last few decades have been good for some places and people, and very bad for others. The gap between the UK’s richest and poorest regions has grown. Returns to graduate labour have increased and returns to vocations have diminished. The social fabric of coastal and industrial towns, particularly, has deteriorated. Civic pride has been squandered.

But the economic case is less intuitive. Economic orthodoxy would say that the best thing governments can do for growth is to get out of the way. To neoclassical economists, levelling up is the economic equivalent of pushing water uphill: eye-wateringly expensive and ultimately futile.

This conventional wisdom is seductive to centre right thinkers given it prioritises market forces and downplays the role of the state. But it is also a narrow view of how economies work in practice, and short-sighted about the damage regional disparities can do to growth. Here are five reasons why levelling up is not just morally and politically sensible, but economically the right thing to do too.”

You can read the full article here.

REPORT
Policing in Peril

Policing in peril explores how forces are mired in a crisis on three fronts: people, purpose and poor technology.

REPORT
Our programme of work 2025-2029
REPORT
Lessons Learned
REPORT
Political Climate

What Conservative target voters really think about energy and the environment

REPORT
Jumping the Gun: Racing to 2030 Before the Field is Set

The implications of racing towards clean energy by 2030, assessed through planning reform and public support

REPORT
Love Thy Neighbour

Exploring the relationship between cities and their peripheral towns.

The Observer

'The Observer' quotes figures from Onward's 'Breaking Blue' report which breaks down the results of the 2024 election. They use the figures to make a case for what the next Tory leader need to prioritise.

Conservative Home

'Conservative Home' mentions Onward's 'The British Entrepreneur' report. The article quotes Onward's findings that British workers are becoming “unusually risk-averse” when it comes to setting up their own business.

The Financial Times

Onward's 'Capital Issues' report is quoted in a 'Financial Times' article on AIM markets and UK small-cap stocks.

The Financial Times

'The Financial Times' covers Onward's 'Capital Issue' report which calls for the abolition of London's AIM markets.

CityAM

A 'CityAM' article about abolishing London's AIM markets quotes Onward's 'Capital Issues' report.

CityAM

'CityAM' quotes Onward's 'Capital Issues' report, which calls for the immediate abolition of London's AIM market.