Getting to Zero
"The transition to renewable energy is essential for our energy security, both in abundance and cost. But Labour’s 2030 approach risks undermining these principles by entrenching resentment to the overall transition. Communities that have already accepted renewables are being asked to take on even more, without proper consultation or compensation. This is not just bad policy—it’s bad politics. Support for net zero does not mean acceptance of every project. Fairness and proportionality are essential for long-term success.”
Laurence Fredricks
The expansion of clean energy generation is critical for securing Britain’s energy future, but a practical and achievable pathway is needed to deliver a decarbonised grid. Labour’s plan to reach clean power by 2030 is one of the most ambitious energy policies globally, aiming for a rapid expansion of onshore wind and solar. But while increasing generation is essential, the UK risks undermining its own targets if it does not ensure that transmission infrastructure keeps pace. Without urgent action, Britain will generate more clean power than it can transmit and therefore use— destabilising energy security and increasing costs for consumers.
The UK’s electricity generation capacity is expanding faster than the transmission network’s ability to distribute power where it is needed. Twice as much grid infrastructure must be built in the next five years as was constructed over the last decade if the UK is to meet its 2030 targets. Yet transmission projects face significant delays, particularly due to local opposition, which is even more pronounced for overground power lines. Delays to just three critical transmission projects in East Anglia and the South East are projected to cost UK consumers £4.2 billion by 2030, as energy that could power homes and businesses instead goes unused. If these issues are not addressed, constraint payments—compensation paid to generators when power cannot be transported—could rise from £0.5-1 billion annually in 2022 to as much as £4 billion per year by the end of the decade.
Beyond technical and financial challenges, the rollout of renewable energy infrastructure risks eroding public support for the transition if fairness and proportionality are not properly considered. Some communities that have already accepted large-scale renewable developments are being asked to take on even more, often with little consultation and no clear local benefits. Research from Onward’s Jumping the Gun report highlights that many of the areas with the most feasible land for new projects are also those that have hosted the largest share of renewables since 1990. Without a more strategic and equitable approach, the risk of increased local resistance could derail the entire clean energy target.
The upcoming Planning and Infrastructure Bill presents a crucial opportunity to address delays and ensure that grid expansion keeps pace with generation. Focus has thus far prioritised generation without acknowledging the simultaneous importance of transmission infrastructure.
The shift to clean energy is vital for Britain’s economic and environmental future, but it must be managed in a way that is both practical and fair. Without urgent action on transmission networks and community engagement, Labour’s 2030 target risks being undermined by local opposition, wasted investment, and rising costs for consumers. Delivering a truly decarbonised grid requires more than just ambitious targets—it demands a credible plan to get there.
1. Prioritise Transmission to Match Generation and Avoid Grid Bottlenecks
1.1 Develop a Centralised Strategic Network Plan (CSNP) with modernised design principles for transmission.
1.2 Shift to an evidence-based approach for overground, underground, and offshore transmission, incorporating community preferences.
1.3 Fast-track delivery by implementing recommendations from the Winser Review to align with renewable capacity targets.
1.4 Commission a comprehensive cost review of transmission infrastructure to update the 2012 analysis and guide future investment decisions.
1.5 Reinstate regional energy planning with a Regionally Significant Infrastructure Project (RSIP) classification to improve coordination and reduce planning delays.
2. Build Community Support through Transparent Engagement and Fair Compensation
2.1 Mandate community benefit schemes for all onshore wind and solar projects, ensuring standardised but locally flexible benefits.
2.2 Pilot community benefits linked to nature restoration funds, creating dual incentives for renewable development and conservation.
2.3 Establish ongoing community engagement requirements throughout the project lifecycle to build trust and sustained support.
3. Balance Energy Development with Nature and Fair Land Distribution
3.1 Integrate the Land Use Framework (LUF) with the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan (SSEP) to protect nature and support local economies.
3.2 Adopt a fair land distribution system, modelled on Germany’s approach, to ensure renewable projects are spread equitably across regions.
3.3 Promote agrivoltaics as a dual-use solution to balance energy generation with food production and biodiversity enhancement.
3.4 Ensure the SSEP addresses transmission constraints and community impacts, rather than focusing solely on generation potential.
4. Strengthen Policy Capacity and Responsiveness
4.1 Reform s106 payments for large-scale energy infrastructure developers to fund local planning capacity and new energy planning roles.
4.2 Implement a mandatory five-year review cycle for National Policy Statements (NPSs) to keep pace with new technologies and capacity needs.
4.3 Assign immediate legal weight to key strategic documents like the SSEP, CSNP, and ETDP for faster integration into planning law.
1. Prioritise Transmission to Match Generation and Avoid Grid Bottlenecks
1.1 Develop a Centralised Strategic Network Plan (CSNP) with modernised design principles for transmission.
1.2 Shift to an evidence-based approach for overground, underground, and offshore transmission, incorporating community preferences.
1.3 Fast-track delivery by implementing recommendations from the Winser Review to align with renewable capacity targets.
1.4 Commission a comprehensive cost review of transmission infrastructure to update the 2012 analysis and guide future investment decisions.
1.5 Reinstate regional energy planning with a Regionally Significant Infrastructure Project (RSIP) classification to improve coordination and reduce planning delays.
2. Build Community Support through Transparent Engagement and Fair Compensation
2.1 Mandate community benefit schemes for all onshore wind and solar projects, ensuring standardised but locally flexible benefits.
2.2 Pilot community benefits linked to nature restoration funds, creating dual incentives for renewable development and conservation.
2.3 Establish ongoing community engagement requirements throughout the project lifecycle to build trust and sustained support.
3. Balance Energy Development with Nature and Fair Land Distribution
3.1 Integrate the Land Use Framework (LUF) with the Strategic Spatial Energy Plan (SSEP) to protect nature and support local economies.
3.2 Adopt a fair land distribution system, modelled on Germany’s approach, to ensure renewable projects are spread equitably across regions.
3.3 Promote agrivoltaics as a dual-use solution to balance energy generation with food production and biodiversity enhancement.
3.4 Ensure the SSEP addresses transmission constraints and community impacts, rather than focusing solely on generation potential.
4. Strengthen Policy Capacity and Responsiveness
4.1 Reform s106 payments for large-scale energy infrastructure developers to fund local planning capacity and new energy planning roles.
4.2 Implement a mandatory five-year review cycle for National Policy Statements (NPSs) to keep pace with new technologies and capacity needs.
4.3 Assign immediate legal weight to key strategic documents like the SSEP, CSNP, and ETDP for faster integration into planning law.
Onward’s Fair Share Renewables Index has crafted a score for each English constituency assessing their relative support for renewables, accommodation of renewables since 1990, and the likelihood they will be earmarked for development to 2030. The data and methodology for this index can be found here.
Your contribution will help fund cutting edge research to make the country a better place.
Support Onward with a donation